Management: Paying for patching Essay

Patch software has been designed to assist with updating estimator programs and fixing a wide range of reckoner related problems. At the same time, conjoin has also been designed to update a computers supporting data. This is normally done in an attempt to sack up better the performance of a computer. Patch oversight involves the process of strategically planning and deciding on which system, the exact patches to use on these systems and at what time (Andress, 2006). Over time, many software companies like Microsoft have resorted to alter their nodes to be able to use patch securely as a free software.In XP SP2, Microsoft made updates that enabled its customers choose to allow Microsoft make spontaneous background updates on their computers. Such technology companies have also deal up with strategies that continuously evolve in attempt to ensuring that their customers do not have to pay for basic patch counsel which provide protective cover to the entire server farm. As a result, getting a management to allocate money to pay for patching has become a surd task given the fact that such software companies offer patching for free to all their customers (Semilof, 2004)Additionally, patching has been configured in a comparatively simple and consistent manner which can be used in businesses which have simple and constant configurations. As a result, getting the management to allocate funds in order to pay for patching becomes unexpressed since the updates configurations are simple and efficient in handling computer affect systems. For instance, when the environment is more complex, Windows update have made provisions and improvements on already existing software so as to allow the customer be able to use their free updates to fit the different IT environments (Semilof, 2004).