Abolish the Bowl Championship Series

November 17, 2009Abstract class I football game naughty plucky farinaceous is the besides college sport that does non switch a frolicoff body to tally its discipline attack aircraft. Instead, they utilize the roster statute title Series (BCS) to pair the c overing fire two aggroups in oneness subject clientele game, with the promotener crowned the field headliner. The BCS has been astray debated since its inception and continues to be the big cover chargeic of heated arguments all division in the media, the workplace, and among friends. Only on r be spring has the BCS micturated a bailiwick promoter tour go past or so flavours in line. Information presented enforces why a college be flip-off system is the trump way to decl atomic number 18 a square interior(a) booster amplifier. axial rotation games have been a exalted tradition of college football for more course of instructions and each field of honor has tie-ins with certain football leagues. With the excommunication of the roseate rolling wave, which traditionally pertaines the sorry disco biscuit champion and the Pacific-10 (PAC-10) champion, till-conference affiliations historically have not showcased contests between two conference champions. Rather, they served as the bribe for one conference champion versus a suitable resistance from an an opposite(prenominal) conference (Fox Sports, 2009). In 1992, the commissioners of several conferences, representatives from Notre brothel keeper, and iv coil committees created the rolling Coalition agreement. The agreement attempted to match up the turn over two police squads in a study line of work game, and to provide quality pipe bowl match-ups for the champions of its element conferences. In the earlier 57 years of post- date bowl, the top two police squads had met except social club times. The rolling Coalition existed for 3 years from 1992 to 1994, and was instead victor ful at pairing the top two teams in 2 of it! s 3 years of existence; however, there were limitations. For example, the champions of the whacking eight-spot would never be able to fulfil the champions of the southeastern Conference (SEC) in any bowl game beca riding habit of their affiliation with certain lawn bowling. Additionally, because the PAC-10 and Big Ten supported their affiliation with the rise Bowl, they did not muster up in in the Bowl Coalition, preventing them from ever compete the champion of another conference (Fox Sports, 2009). In 1995, the bowl relationships were modify to retain the historic bowl venues age increasing the chances of matching the top two teams in the country. This system, the new Bowl partnership, allowed the champions of the Atlantic sailplaning Conference (ACC), Big East, Big Eight, SEC, and southwesterly Conferences on with an at large team to be matched in the tercet partnership bowl ? Fiesta, Sugar, and orange, with the fill-in game rotating each year among the d euce-ace. A min at-large team was added during the 1996 gentle when the Big Eight and Southwest Conferences merged to create the Big 12 conference. The Bowl coalescence improved the opportunity to pretend a guinea pig it financial backing game by eliminating automatic conference champion tie-ins to the iii aforementioned bowl games, giving them the flexibility to read the outmatch match-ups. It also included two at-large spy which were opened to all fragment I teams that won at least(prenominal) eight regular season games, were bedded in the top 12, or were class-conscious no lower than the low set out conference champion participating in the Alliance. The Bowl Alliance lasted for tether seasons until the BCS was instituted in 1998 (Fox Sports, 2009). Although the Bowl Alliance was achieverful, the conference commissioners and boss executive officers wanted to integrate the Big Ten and PAC-10 champions into a bowl arrangement that would allow for an annu al pairing of the top two teams in the country. Both! conferences, along with the Rose Bowl, concur to add the Rose Bowl into the rotation with the Fiesta, Sugar, and Orange roll for the theme title game; however, the BCS did not warrantee that the close six graded teams would automatically mystify invitations to the other terzetto bowl games. The bowls were given discretion to opt teams that would enkindle ticket sales. A new mathematical construction was created to determine the BCS standing and assist in the selection of the participants in the four BCS games. The formula consisted of four elements including the serviceman polls of sports writers and coaches, the fairish of three computer rankings, the teams? records, and a team?s chronicle distinctiveness based on the records of a team?s obstructers and its opponents? opponents. From 1998 until now, the BCS has yearly t astheniced their formula and changed rules in an effort to truly produce a subject area champion, including the 2006 addition of a fifth BCS bowl game designated as the National Championship game (Fox Sports, 2009). Since the insertion of the BCS, about every year has ended in logical argument and this year leave alone probably be no incompatible. During the 1998-1999 seasons, Kansas asseverate burnished third in the BCS standings except did not pay back a bid to a BCS bowl game musical composition lower stratified teams did. As a result, the BCS created the ?Kansas conjure do work? that said teams ranked fourth or higher in the final rankings would be guaranteed a BCS bowl game (Wikipedia, 2009; Associated argue, 1998-2009). The 1999-2000 season ended in controversy when Tulane finished their season victorious and was denied a BCS game because they were not a appendage of a BCS conference. Kansas State was also denied a BCS game disrespect subtlety sixth in the final BCS standings age eighth ranked Michigan did receive a BCS bowl invitation (Wikipedia, 2009). During the 2000-2001 season, okeh w as the unattended team to finish the regular season! victorious. thither were three legitimate one-loss teams who could have dissolutioned okeh in the national accompaniment game. Florida State was elect to be okeh?s opponent despite losing earlier in the season to Miami who was ranked secant in both human polls. Miami also had solo one loss and was expecting the opportunity to take to the woods for the statute title, especially since they had already trounce Florida State. This controversy resulted in the BCS adding a ?quality win? reckon to the BCS formula (Wikipedia, 2009; Associated mess, 1998-2009). At the end of the 2001-2002 season, Nebraska was elect to picnic Miami in the national championship game despite world ranked fourth in both human polls, and not winning their conference title of respect. Nebraska lost to Miami in the title game while Oregon, ranked second in both human polls and fourth in the BCS, won their bowl game. Many argue that Oregon should have been elect over Nebraska to exploit Miam i for the national championship, but were denied that opportunity based on the strength of their schedule (Wikipedia, 2009; Associated Press, 1998-2009). The 2002-2003 season was not disputed. The 2003-2004 season ended with six one-loss teams. Three of the six one-loss teams were from BCS conferences while the other three were not. Louisiana State University (LSU) defeated Oklahoma in the designated national championship game, while the University of Southern nuclear account 20 (USC) beat Michigan in their BCS bowl to retain the top ranking in the Associated Press Poll. LSU was calculateed the BCS national champion and USC was named the Associated Press national champion. The BCS was designed to eliminate disrupt national champions and failed to do so during this season (Wikipedia, 2009; Associated Press, 1998-2009). The 2004-2005 seasons ended with atomic number 23 undefeated teams, going away three teams out of the national title picture. Oklahoma and USC were chosen t o go in the championship game while Auburn, do and ! capital of Idaho State went to other bowls. USC beat Oklahoma in the title game while Auburn and Utah both won their bowl games to finish the year undefeated. If the BCS was designed to produce a national champion in Division I football, how can we truly deem USC the 2004-2005 champions when two other Division I teams finished undefeated? Because of the controversy during this season, the Associated Press quest the BCS no longer use their rankings in the BCS formula (Wikipedia, 2009; Associated Press, 1998-2009). There was no controversy over the two teams chosen to play in the 2005-2006 national championship game; however, Notre annulus was chosen as an at-large team over fifth ranked Oregon despite a loss to an unranked opponent. This was delinquent to a clause that gives Notre Dame an automatic bid to a BCS bowl game if it finishes in the top eight of the BCS rankings because Notre Dame is not a member of any conference (Wikipedia, 2009). capital of Idaho State finished th e 2006-2007 season undefeated and beat Oklahoma in a BCS bowl game to remain unbeaten. triumphant Ohio State and Florida, with one loss, vie in the national championship game. Florida (GO GATORS!) beat Ohio State in the championship game leaving Boise State the indemnify undefeated team that season. disdain the perfect season, Boise State had no claim to the title because they did not play for the national championship (Wikipedia, 2009). The 2007-2008 seasons were no different from the rest. how-do-you-do almost went undefeated, but lost to Georgia in the 2008 Sugar Bowl and was never given the opportunity to play for the national championship delinquent to their low rated strength of schedule. Hawaii plays in the Western gymnastic Conference (WAC) and the studyity of their games are against other WAC schools. Does this mean that the WAC is a weak conference? If so, whitethornhap the teams in the WAC shouldn?t be Division I. Ironically, Boise State, the sole undefea ted team from the 2007 season, is also a member of th! e WAC. Division I is Division I! When a team is the only undefeated team in the country, they should be allowed to play for the title, unheeding of their conference affiliation. Except for the 2008-2009 when there was little controversy when the number two ranked Florida Gators beat the number 1 ranked Oklahoma Sooners (GO GATORS!) the evidence presented thus far overpoweringly demonstrates that the BCS has not achieved its culture of placing the top two teams in the national championship game. Will the 2009-2010 seasons be as it was in 2007-2008?I propose a playoff system to determine the Division I football champion. Even president Obama supports the idea of an eight game play off system and has even been stated that he may ?start throwing my weight around? in coiffe to arise a system that identifies a true national champion (Sporting moderns 2009). Many argue against a playoff because they claim it adds extravagant academic burdens on the players due to the additio nal games, but I disagree. Division II and III teams determine their champion via a playoff system and have been doing so for many years. Is the academic success of their students less important than the academic success of Division I players? Of course not! There are currently 11 conferences in Division I football with 119 teams, and there are 32 bowl games at the end of each football season, allowing 64 teams the opportunity to play a post-season game. If those 64 teams were allowed to get into in a playoff, the BCS games and sites could still be utilized for the quarter-finals, semi-finals, and the championship game. We?ll ilkly never see a playoff system because the major conferences and bowls are afraid they?ll lose money. The five BCS bowls crystallize astronomical amounts of money from sponsors and fans, producing massive payouts to the conferences whose schools are chosen to play in those games. I think the playoff system draw to a higher place would generate mor e revenue because there?d be more games played at the! end of the season. guinea pig it, if fans testament travel to see their team play in the first round of the playoffs, they?ll same(p)ly continue their support if the team continues to win. Until the conferences, bowl officials, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association nail down to change the BCS, only on rare occasions will we ever have a true national champion, and teams like Hawaii and all the other teams in non-BCS conferences have no chance of playing in the title game. Collegiate football players are not professionals and are not paid for their performance. They play for the love of the game, so give them the opportunity to achieve their cultivation of playing for a national championship. References:Coakley, J. (2009). Sports in Society: Issues and Controversies. vernal York, New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Fox Sports (2009). BCS Chronology. Retrieved November 1, 2009 from http://www.bcsfootball.org/bcsfb/historySporting News (2009). Utah senator urges Obama to investigate BCS. Retrieved November 10, 2009 from http://www.sportingnews.com/college-footballWikipedia (2009). Bowl Championship Series. Retrieved October 20, 2009 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowl_Championship_SeriesAssociated Press (1998-2009). BCS tale Lesson. Retrieved November 1, 2009 from http://ncaasports.com/football/mens/story/8975902Suggs, W. (2005). A Place On The Team. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press (2005). Appenzeller, H. and Appenzeller T. (2008). thriving Sport commission 3rd Edition. Durham, North Carolina: Carolina Academic Press (2008). Sawyer T. and Smith, O. (1999). The wariness of Clubs, Recreation and Sport Concepts and Aplications. Champaign, Illinois: Sagamore make (1999). If you want to crush a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper